

浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1. 中国科学技术大学信息科学技术学院,安徽 合肥 230027
2. 中国科学院电磁空间信息重点实验室,安徽 合肥 230027
3. 中国科学技术大学网络空间安全学院,安徽 合肥 230027
Online First:2023-08,
Published:25 August 2023
移动端阅览
Yifan HE, Jie ZHANG, Weiming ZHANG, et al. Privacy leakage risk assessment for reversible neural network[J]. Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security, 2023, 9(4): 29-39.
Yifan HE, Jie ZHANG, Weiming ZHANG, et al. Privacy leakage risk assessment for reversible neural network[J]. Chinese Journal of Network and Information Security, 2023, 9(4): 29-39. DOI: 10.11959/j.issn.2096-109x.2023051.
近年来,深度学习已经成为多方领域的核心技术,而深度学习模型的训练过程中往往需要大量的数据,这些数据中可能含有隐私信息,包括个人身份信息(如电话号码、身份证号等)和敏感信息(如金融财务、医疗健康等)。因此,人工智能模型的隐私风险问题成为学术界的研究热点。深度学习模型的隐私研究仅局限于传统神经网络,而很少针对特殊网络结构的新兴网络(如可逆神经网络)。可逆神经网络的上层信息输入可以由下层输出直接得到,直观上讲,该结构保留了更多有关训练数据的信息,相比传统网络具有更大的隐私泄露风险。为此,提出从数据隐私泄露和模型功能隐私泄露两个层面来探讨深度网络的隐私问题,并将该风险评估策略应用到可逆神经网络。具体来说,选取了两种经典的可逆神经网络(RevNet 和i-RevNet),并使用了成员推理攻击、模型逆向攻击、属性推理攻击和模型窃取攻击 4 种攻击手段进行隐私泄露分析。实验结果表明,可逆神经网络在面对数据层面的隐私攻击时存在相比传统神经网络更严重的隐私泄露风险,而在面对模型层面的隐私攻击时存在相似的隐私泄露风险。由于可逆神经网络研究越来越多,目前被广泛被应用于各种任务,这些任务也涉及敏感数据,在实验结果分析基础上提出了一些潜在的解决方法,希望能够应用于未来可逆神经网络的发展。
In recent years
deep learning has emerged as a crucial technology in various fields.However
the training process of deep learning models often requires a substantial amount of data
which may contain private and sensitive information such as personal identities and financial or medical details.Consequently
research on the privacy risk associated with artificial intelligence models has garnered significant attention in academia.However
privacy research in deep learning models has mainly focused on traditional neural networks
with limited exploration of emerging networks like reversible networks.Reversible neural networks have a distinct structure where the upper information input can be directly obtained from the lower output.Intuitively
this structure retains more information about the training data
potentially resulting in a higher risk of privacy leakage compared to traditional networks.Therefore
the privacy of reversible networks was discussed from two aspects: data privacy leakage and model function privacy leakage.The risk assessment strategy was applied to reversible networks.Two classical reversible networks were selected
namely RevNet and i-RevNet.And four attack methods were used accordingly
namely membership inference attack
model inversion attack
attribute inference attack
and model extraction attack
to analyze privacy leakage.The experimental results demonstrate that reversible networks exhibit more serious privacy risks than traditional neural networks when subjected to membership inference attacks
model inversion attacks
and attribute inference attacks.And reversible networks have similar privacy risks to traditional neural networks when subjected to model extraction attack.Considering the increasing popularity of reversible neural networks in various tasks
including those involving sensitive data
it becomes imperative to address these privacy risks.Based on the analysis of the experimental results
potential solutions were proposed which can be applied to the development of reversible networks in the future.
SHOKRI R , STRONATI M , SONG C , et al . Membership inference attacks against machine learning models [C ] // IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy . 2017
KHOSRAVY M , NAKAMURA K , HIROSE Y , et al . Model inversion attack:analysis under gray-box scenario on deep learning based face recognition system [J ] . KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems , 2021 , 15 ( 3 ): 1100 - 1119 .
TRUONG J B , MAINI P , WALLS R , et al . Data-free model extraction [C ] // IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . 2021
谭作文 , 张连福 . 机器学习隐私保护研究综述 [J ] . 软件学报 , 2020 , 31 ( 7 ): 30 .
TAN Z W , ZHANG L F . Survey on privacy preserving techniques for machine learning [J ] . Journal of Software . 2020 , 31 ( 7 ): 30 .
DINH L , KRUEGER D , BENGIO Y . NICE:non-linear independent components estimation [J ] . Computer Science , 2014 .
GOMEZ A N , REN M , URTASUN R , et al . The reversible residual network:backpropagation without storing activations [C ] // International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems(NIPS) . 2017 : 2211 - 2221 .
JACOBSEN J H , SMEULDERS A , OYALLON E . i-RevNet:deep invertible networks [C ] // International Conference on Learning Representations . 2018 .
MELIS L , SONG C Z , DE-CRISTOFARO E , et al . Exploiting unintended feature leakage in collaborative learning [C ] // Proc of the IEEE Symp on Security and Privacy . 2019
TRAMÈR F , ZHANG F , JUELS A , et al . Stealing machine learning models via prediction APIs [C ] // Proc of the USENIX Security Symposium . 2016 : 601 - 618 .
SALEM A , ZHANG Y , HUMBERT M , et al . ML-Leaks:model and data independent membership inference attacks and defenses on machine learning models [C ] // Network and Distributed Systems Security (NDSS) Symposium . 2019 .
CHEN S I , KAHLA M , JIA R X , et al . Knowledge-enriched distributional model inversion attacks [C ] // Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) . 2021 : 16178 - 16187 .
SZEGEDY C , VANHOUCKE V , IOFFE S , et al . Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision [C ] // Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) . 2016 : 2818 - 2826 .
LIU Y , WEN R , HE X , et al . ML-doctor:holistic risk assess ment of inference attacks against machine learning models [C ] // USENIX Security Symposium . 2022 .
MEJIA F A , GAMBLE P , HAMPEL-ARIAS Z , et al . Robust or private? adversarial training makes models more vulnerable to privacy attacks [R ] . 2019 .
AL-RUBAIE M , CHANG J M . Privacy-preserving machine learning:threats and solutions [J ] . IEEE Security & Privacy , 2019 , 17 ( 2 ): 49 - 58 .
ABADI M , CHU A , GOODFELLOW I , et al . Deep learning with differential privacy [C ] // ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) . 2016 : 308 - 318 .
CHOO C A C , TRAMER F , CARLINI N , et al . Label-only membership inference attacks [J ] . arXiv Preprint arXiv:2007.14321 , 2020 .
CHENG Z , LI Z , ZHANG J , et al . Differentially private machine learning model against model extraction attack [C ] // 2020 International Conferences on Internet of Things (iThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber,Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData) and IEEE Congress on Cybermatics (Cybermatics) . 2020 .
JIA J Y , SALEM A , BACKES M , et al . MemGuard:defending againstblack-box membership inference attacks via adversarial examples [C ] // Proceedings of 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security . 2019 : 259 - 274 .
NASR M , SHOKRI R , HOUMANSADR A . Comprehensive privacy analysis of deep learning:passive and active white-box inference attacks against centralized and federated learning [C ] // Proceedings of 2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy . 2019 : 739 - 753 .
ZHANG G , LIU B , TIAN H , et al . How does a deep learning model architecture impact its privacy [J ] . arXiv Preprint arXiv:2210.11049 , 2022 .
0
Views
470
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621